May we see the sun rise;
May we see the sun set;
And between the two in every way;
May we know peace profound.
May we see the sun rise;
May we see the sun set;
And between the two in every way;
May we know peace profound.
You may have heard that people could be infected while presenting no symptoms: the asymptomatics. But, what if it were the case that some, if not all, got a false positive from the test? That, in truth, they were negative, but tested positive in fact. A simple way to then explain the incongruence of the resulting non-presentation of symptoms, would be to tag the fortunate subjects asymptomatic—carriers. Double check? Take appropriate safety measures, should(n’t) they be again tested; perhaps at a different location and using a different make and brand of equipment and/or method. What are the relative costs and risks? Someone suggested that a significant proportion of the infections recorded for political office holders were of this kind. A ruse? Not improbable, at worst.
Reflecting on why a new variant of the infamous entity that caused the dis-ease, which marred social dancing in 2020, emerged towards the end of the year. It seems plausible—at least not entirely implausible—that, since, apparently, its emergence coincided with some period of vaccine trials …, that it was the product of virus/vaccine research gone awry, or the response of infected persons that had been ‘trially’ vaccinated, …. Because, apparently, the virus had lived without evolving a kin or dialect for most of 2020, until …. And, apparently, the new variant is localised. God knows how this dialectal continuum emerged.
Imagine a Biden-Trump presidency where they both had to work together as co-presidents for America’s good.
Would one filibuster the other;
would one seek to outdo the other by gargantuan proportions;
would one try to impeach the other;
would one talk to make people feel good;
would one talk his mind;
would one move to get things done fast;
would one get the true done;
would one help get more business into the pockets of ordinary American businesses;
would one print more dollars to put money in the pocket of America;
would one call bullshit shit;
would one negotiate bullshit;
would one make Americans angry and America happy;
would one make Americans happy and America sad;
Would both be American;
Would the words of the ‘founding fathers’ commend either;
Users and computers in an enterprise IT system are monitored for performance, (in)security and auditing purposes. And as we’ve seen and heard, users in social media platforms are similarly monitored.
A user, in sharing information—whether public or private—on the platform, has also shared information with an unseen ‘friend’. This friend, the platform’s self, mines and processes users’ information and generates ‘knowledge’ that may be used to monetise users’ use of the platform.
Users are provided facilities to do their jobs, and they get paid for doing so. But the users in the Facebook ecosystem, for instance, have no share of her profits. They should perhaps just be grateful that they have facilities to do their jobs or pass their time.
Imagine what might happen if the users go on strike for 6 months…? Or all resign at the same time?
Even in the most terrible of situations,
these people build humour.
You might wonder whether it’s a coping mechanism.
We wonder too.
It seems almost innate to make jests in a storm;
and more so after the dusts have settled.
Afterall, it is the more you can do while trying your best—or after.
Viktor Frankl might be proud.
My generalisation may be incorrect, but the average Nigerian feels entitled to the proverbial ‘national cake’; the one those in goverment—and their croonies—have been feasting on for longer than the youths can remember. The youths have learned too. And a good number have successfully tried to partake of the global cake, sometimes considering it the easier option.
In a country like Nigeria it can be difficult to properly identify those most in need of the covid-19 foods palliatives. Certainly, there are poor people that don’t look as poor and ‘rich’ people that don’t look as rich. We’ve heard of a one-legged man who begs for alms; he has a house, nice clothes etc. People struggling in their hussle, and who may not even have a piece of land to build a house on happily give him money; apparently he’s cool, standing in traffic…. Please don’t take this the wrong way.
There’s no country like Nigeria.
So a warehouse was found in Lagos last week, or thereabout, with foodstuff branded as palliatives for the 2020 lockdowns inspired by a desire to stave off the mysterious SARS-COV-2 virus touring the nation. It was looted. People have been scouring other states for similar warehouses. About a week before that I came across two pictures placed side by side. One showed packaged noodles distributed as palliative while the other, nice looking meals packed for those in the ‘endSARS’ … protests. The message was clear. Now partially vindicated by the discovery of the warehouse(s). We’ve at least seen where [some of] the money went.
Stop the burning and looting, biko! But they will not be consoled—even after. The miscreants have taken over. I fear some of them are the same people contributing to insecurity at some bus-stops … when it’s dark—usually.
It now seems like the art of governance is tantamount to the art of personal enrichment. Where the people in power create schemes to skim—no, shovel—national/state/local government income into their personal/family and croonies pockets. (I’ve heard randomly that one former governor is an innovator in this field of studies.)
Those ‘under’ them in government, perhaps now, so as ‘not to carry last’, have their methods too. You may have to pay transport money to someone to move your file through/to the required desk, for instance. The issue is now systemic; having a life of its own. People could even get hired/fired based on how well they maintain the status quo. Certainly, that makes good business sense. The business of goverment is business afterall. It just has been largely for the benefit of a select—the special ones. Bad still, the private sector is not spared. Yet, the many awesome and smart and honest and pleasant … Nigerians keep the ball rolling.
I heard someone exclaim jovially, “Omo, wahala dey!” (meaning that there is trouble), while discussing possible solutions to some of Nigeria’s pressing problems. In all, we closed with “Nigeria go better”, (taken from a song) a phrase of hope, but in reality sometimes spoken with a tone of resignation—well, not today.
The Nigerian Eagle has landed (spoken as a prophecy). We fly green-white-green.
He never seems to leave her
because she lives inside;
the pleasant and the hard
and all the shades between.
complicit in where I am today—
where I am tomorrow
if I’ll let.
To choose because of you;
to choose despite you;
you appear as you will
something to relish or leave.
I need you because I want you;
the converse could be stressful.
I want you because I want to love you;
I want to love you because—just because.
Je ne sais quoi.
God does not appear to need man;
yet he lives and acts as though he does—just because.
Americans whose primary or only identity is American
The Red Indian
The European Settler
The Hispanic from the South
The Black (of Former Slaves)
The Black (Migrant)
The left lean on feelings; sometimes to the point that they appear to be brainless.
The right focus on ‘right thinking’; sometimes to the point that they appear to be heartless—depending on who’s looking.
Right thinking focuses more on commonsense, the commonsensical, and absolute truths, ideas that left thinking leaves for last when they consider them.
However, there’s no difference between the extreme left and the extreme right: they either connect to nothing at their extremes, or, if a circle is formed from the continuum line of left to right, the extreme left will connect to the extreme right.
When dealing with humans, that we have feeling and freewill and inherent dignity, makes extremes, if at all considered, only useful, if at all useful, in virtual reality for analysis, and for the sake of curiousity.
[What creatures are these?]
We call them ‘hoomans’. There are different species, by skin colour and hair characteristics among other traits; they group themselves in regions, although there has been some mixing.
[Tell me more.]
Yes indeed. Our explorers chanced upon them 5000 years ago and we’ve been studying them since.
[By the way, have you interacted with them before?]
Sir, remember that our policy is to be noninvasive, at first. This is because we want first to have enough information to be able to predict their collective, and every individual, response to us, our society and our worldview.
[Where are we on that?]
There are issues. Their behaviour is not uniform across regions and species; likewise within regions and species. It appears there’s a programming such that anyone can adopt any behaviour, at any time, and for no determinable reason; they say it is ‘free will’, an absolute volition.
They are also of two kinds, one particularly special because other hoomans can come out of ‘har’—a kind of reproduction. Those special ones we call ‘wimen’, in general. On average, they reproduce randomly and frequently, probably because they don’t live long in general. It appears that they have to make new hoomans more often so that they don’t die out. A hundred and twenty years is a very old age to them. Most of them don’t get there, but that hasn’t always been the case and we can’t really tell what changed. We indeed need to be isolated from them and we need to know how interaction with us will affect their lives and living.
[What initiates their reproduction? How is it that some body can come out of somebody?]
The have what they call ‘sekshuaal intacus’ between the kinds; one kind, the one we call mana-hooman, places a protruding part of his body inside one of the senior wimen and deposits something inside her. The wimena-hooman has an orifice to receive the mana-hooman’s middle protrusion. Apparently it is something they enjoy doing whether or not it leads to new hoomans which we have called ‘babi-hooman’. Additionally, we noticed inter-species coupling. We find that interesting. There are also anomalous intercourses: pseudo-intercourse behaviours between the same kind that naturally leads to nothing by design. They will all die out eventually if they all assumed such anomalous behaviour exclusively.
[Tell me more about interspecies relations]
Perhaps the most interesting thing is that over the five millennia that we’ve been watching them, we have observed, sporadically and severally, seasons when they eliminate one another at various scales by various means. But note that this has occurred both between species and within species. We find this both intriguing and confusing.
Sir, let me just tell you that our scientists have decided that we cannot assuredly always predict their behaviour, particularly on a microscopic and individual scale; they can be both consistently inconsistent and inconsistently consistent.
[Because we need to know how each and every individual will relate with us and their kin if we choose to interact with them, we shall find a way to kill the freeness of their wills and the apparent randomness in their volition. Screw policy.]