You may have heard that people could be infected while presenting no symptoms: the asymptomatics. But, what if it were the case that some, if not all, got a false positive from the test? That, in truth, they were negative, but tested positive in fact. A simple way to then explain the incongruence of the resulting non-presentation of symptoms, would be to tag the fortunate subjects asymptomatic—carriers. Double check? Take appropriate safety measures, should(n’t) they be again tested; perhaps at a different location and using a different make and brand of equipment and/or method. What are the relative costs and risks? Someone suggested that a significant proportion of the infections recorded for political office holders were of this kind. A ruse? Not improbable, at worst.
Reflecting on why a new variant of the infamous entity that caused the dis-ease, which marred social dancing in 2020, emerged towards the end of the year. It seems plausible—at least not entirely implausible—that, since, apparently, its emergence coincided with some period of vaccine trials …, that it was the product of virus/vaccine research gone awry, or the response of infected persons that had been ‘trially’ vaccinated, …. Because, apparently, the virus had lived without evolving a kin or dialect for most of 2020, until …. And, apparently, the new variant is localised. God knows how this dialectal continuum emerged.
Imagine a Biden-Trump presidency where they both had to work together as co-presidents for America’s good.
Would one filibuster the other;
would one seek to outdo the other by gargantuan proportions;
would one try to impeach the other;
would one talk to make people feel good;
would one talk his mind;
would one move to get things done fast;
would one get the true done;
would one help get more business into the pockets of ordinary American businesses;
would one print more dollars to put money in the pocket of America;
would one call bullshit shit;
would one negotiate bullshit;
would one make Americans angry and America happy;
would one make Americans happy and America sad;
Would both be American;
Would the words of the ‘founding fathers’ commend either;
The top flew off and
the champagne poured out with pleasure;
There was an ease afterwards;
I could now sip my tea inside peace
with a calmness that lived within;
The smell of green and
freshness after the rains.
Self: a self-referential meaning. That is inherent is the sense of the word itself. It is self-referential in the sense of a recursive acronym. For example, WINE. Wine represents, ‘WINE Is Not an Emulator’. The first letter of the first word represented by the acronym, is the acronym itself. In terms of meaning, this translates to defining self with self present—and key—in the definition.
Other words of a similar nature may be, ‘truth’, and ‘love’. Concept-constructs of that which can be imagined purely by itself, with no references or relations to other things or standards. In other words, of that that exist without necessary relation to others, being independent of context-dependent interpretation. Simply ‘selfly’—or ‘self-ful’. Words of this nature can have no exact opposites, like the number ‘0’ in a way.
Both self-referential in meaning and existence, self is a noun that admits no adjectival qualification. For instance, there can be no such thing as ‘good self’ or ‘bad self’. Self is self-contained: it is exactly what it is.